Update on Push?

[Léonie Watson]

Martin, Peter,

Could you give the WG an update on progress? I think we just need to
solve #270 [1], and the related PR #287, then we'll be ready to get the
spec moving again.


Thanks
Léonie
[1] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/270
[2] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/287--
@LeonieWatson @***@toot.cafe Carpe diem

[Martin Thomson]

I've just merged #287. I've suggested that #270 be closed without changes.

Beyond that, it might not be appropriate to move this yet. I keep
hearing that we'll be hearing from new implementers any day now. Of
course, that's being going on for a while and if you want to clear
your plate, then feel free to give it a nudge.

Post by Léonie Watson
Martin, Peter,
Could you give the WG an update on progress? I think we just need to solve
#270 [1], and the related PR #287, then we'll be ready to get the spec
moving again.
Thanks
Léonie
[1] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/270
[2] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/287--
@LeonieWatson @***@toot.cafe Carpe diem

[Léonie Watson]

Post by Martin Thomson
I've just merged #287. I've suggested that #270 be closed without changes.

Thanks Martin. Chaals has submitted a PR with his suggested changes [1],
if you have time to review/merge, that'd be welcome.

Post by Martin Thomson
Beyond that, it might not be appropriate to move this yet. I keep
hearing that we'll be hearing from new implementers any day now. Of
course, that's being going on for a while and if you want to clear
your plate, then feel free to give it a nudge.

If it turns out that we have at least two implementations of each
feature, which I think we probably do between Chrome and Firefox, it'd
be good to get to Rec. If we gain more implementors along the way, so
much the better. Sound ok?


Léonie
[1] https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/294